Food groups

Regulators write additive rules against their own categories of food, and the categories do not match: what the EU calls 1.8 gathers every dairy analogue in one place, Codex files each one beside the product it imitates, and Australia and New Zealand have no such class at all. These pages put an everyday group of foods — cheese, bread, soft drinks, baby food — beside each system's categories for it, and show which additives each permits there.

Each mapping is this site's reading, not an official equivalence. Where a system cuts the food differently, or has no category for it, the group's page says so. Treat a side-by-side comparison as a starting point and read the category and the conditions before relying on it.

How to read these

Close. The systems draw this group the same way, give or take internal detail.

Approximate. The systems agree on roughly this group of foods but cut it up differently.

Partial. At least one system has no category for this group, or files it somewhere much broader.

Canada, Japan, South Korea and the United States are absent, each for the same underlying reason: none of the four writes its rules against a numbered system of food categories. Canada names foods in prose; Japan's and South Korea's standards of use, which this site does import, name them in prose too, in the notification's own wording; and the US mostly permits a substance for food generally rather than food by food. For those four, read the additive's own page, where the foods each names are set out in full.